Hi Hugh,
Thanks for the very interesting link to the relevant case law.
To answer your questions:
BA purchased the ticket on SAA - I wasn't consulted, I was simply handed the ticket and had no choice in the matter. I think they have an agreement in place with other airlines in this regard.
My letter to BA did request compensation for loss of enjoyment/amenity. In the spreadsheet I sent them I detailed three separate areas in which I was seeking compensation:
1. Compensation for £118 as a result of having my travel delayed by 24 hours - lost day car hire, hotel, plus phone calls, internet usage contacting the relevant parties in South Africa to inform them, and airport refreshments purchased as a result of the delay. I was given a verbal assurance at the time that these expenses would be reinmbursed.
2. Compensation for £275 for clothing I needed to purchase during my two week stay. This included everything from toiletries, suncream, swimming costume to underwear, essential medicine, new travel bag, mobile adaptor and towels.
3. Instead of loss of amenity, I listed lost time spent trying to locate the lost baggage, time spent at baggage reclaim, care hire changes and acquring replacement items. I put a cost of £320 on this (based on 8 hours at £40 per hour).
Regards,
Warren
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Warren,
Did you make a claim for loss of enjoyment/amenity in the written claim you sent to BA already-or was the spreadsheet limited to out of pocket
expenses ?
They may be busy-but they may also be thinking about this. I'm not sure how many passengers even go so far as to make a claim for out of pocket expenses-never mind any form of "less liquidated" expense.
BA were the (original) contracting carrier and when they booked the flight for you on SAA-were SAA just doing this as their (BA's) agent as actual carrier?
Regarding the "local of amenity/loss of enjoyment" aspect this may indeed need a bit of thought.
The purveyed received wisdom (previously?) presented by carriers is that a contract of carriage might not entail this type of damage recoverability under a contract of carriage.
The baggage delay claim would be bound by the Montreal convention provisions as embodied within whatever local law-and hence wouldbe governed by that exculsivity aspect-as well as the prohibition on punitive damages.
However there was a Scottish appeal case quite recently ( I dont know whether there may be something more recent) that did canvass a review of some submitted (mostly first instance) case decisions in this area.
This would need unravelling-especially to look at how precisely in the genesis of the case the claimant was successful at this appeal-but it may be a starting point to start to consider you question.
(Remember the Scottish claimant here was also coincidentally a canny Scottish lawyer who also (frugally?) travels by Ryanair).
(I'm not sure how many delayed baggage claims ever get to first instance hearing never mind get to an appellate court-I'm sure it can't be many).
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/SA105907.html
|